fastify vs @hapi/hapi
fastify is downloaded 5.2× more often than @hapi/hapi (31,079,568 vs 6,014,914 per month), so it has the larger community and more answered questions online. Both projects are actively maintained.
| Metric | fastify | @hapi/hapi |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly downloads | 7,307,661✓ | 1,448,062 |
| Monthly downloads | 31,079,568✓ | 6,014,914 |
| GitHub stars | 36,351✓ | 14,786 |
| Minified size | 471.7 kB | — |
| Minified + gzipped | 129.8 kB | — |
| Dependencies | 15 | — |
| Open issues | 146 | 61✓ |
| Last commit | 2026-06-01✓ | 2026-05-06 |
| Latest version | 5.8.5 | 21.4.9 |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
When to choose which
fastify
A fast, low-overhead framework with schema validation.
Choose it when: High-throughput APIs where you want JSON-schema validation, structured logging and first-class TypeScript.
- + Very high performance
- + Schema validation built-in
- + Great TypeScript
- - Smaller ecosystem than Express
- - Plugin model to learn
@hapi/hapi
A configuration-centric framework with built-in validation.
Choose it when: Config-driven apps that want validation, auth and caching as first-class, built-in concepts.
- + Built-in validation & auth
- + Config over code
- + Stable
- - Smaller community now
- - More verbose
Feature comparison
| Feature | fastify | @hapi/hapi |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | Minimal+ | Config-driven |
| TypeScript-first | ✓ Yes | Partial |
| Performance | Very high | Moderate |
| Built-in features | Validation, logging | Validation, auth, cache |
| Ecosystem | Large | Medium |
Related comparisons
Embed this comparison
A live badge for your README — it updates as the numbers change.
[](https://devcompare.dev/compare/fastify-vs-hapi-hapi)Data from npm, Bundlephobia and GitHub. Last updated 2026-06-02.