react-redux vs xstate
react-redux is downloaded 5.3× more often than xstate (108,155,943 vs 20,263,809 per month), so it has the larger community and more answered questions online. react-redux ships 74% less gzipped JavaScript (3.7 kB vs 14.1 kB), which matters if bundle size is a priority. Both projects are actively maintained.
| Metric | react-redux | xstate |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly downloads | 25,466,427✓ | 4,469,231 |
| Monthly downloads | 108,155,943✓ | 20,263,809 |
| GitHub stars | 23,483 | 29,666✓ |
| Minified size | 9.5 kB✓ | 44.7 kB |
| Minified + gzipped | 3.7 kB✓ | 14.1 kB |
| Dependencies | 2 | 0✓ |
| Open issues | 37✓ | 123 |
| Last commit | 2026-05-15 | 2026-06-01✓ |
| Latest version | 9.3.0 | 5.32.0 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
When to choose which
react-redux
Official React bindings for Redux — not a store by itself.
Choose it when: Whenever you use Redux/RTK in React. It connects the store to components; pair it with Redux Toolkit.
- + Official & optimized
- + Hooks API (useSelector/useDispatch)
- - Useless without a Redux store
- - Adds a provider
xstate
Explicit state machines and statecharts.
Choose it when: Complex flows (wizards, async sequences, UI with many states) where you want logic that is explicit, testable and visualizable.
- + Impossible states become impossible
- + Visualizable logic
- + Framework-agnostic
- - Steepest learning curve here
- - Overkill for simple state
Feature comparison
| Feature | react-redux | xstate |
|---|---|---|
| Paradigm | Redux bindings | State machines |
| First-class TypeScript | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works outside React | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| Dedicated devtools | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Built-in async / server state | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| Boilerplate | Low | High |
Related comparisons
Embed this comparison
A live badge for your README — it updates as the numbers change.
[](https://devcompare.dev/compare/react-redux-vs-xstate)Data from npm, Bundlephobia and GitHub. Last updated 2026-06-02.