@stitches/react vs styled-components
styled-components is downloaded 12.2× more often than @stitches/react (40,345,140 vs 3,294,994 per month), so it has the larger community and more answered questions online.
| Metric | @stitches/react | styled-components |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly downloads | 849,142 | 10,079,059✓ |
| Monthly downloads | 3,294,994 | 40,345,140✓ |
| GitHub stars | — | — |
| Minified size | — | 32.2 kB |
| Minified + gzipped | — | 12.6 kB |
| Dependencies | — | 4 |
| Open issues | — | — |
| Last commit | — | — |
| Latest version | 1.2.8 | 6.4.2 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
When to choose which
@stitches/react
Near-zero-runtime CSS-in-JS with first-class variants.
Choose it when: Design systems wanting typed variants and tokens — but note the project is no longer actively maintained.
- + First-class variants
- + Near-zero runtime
- + Typed tokens
- - No longer actively maintained
- - Smaller community now
styled-components
The classic component-scoped CSS-in-JS library.
Choose it when: Component-scoped styles with tagged template literals in classic React (client components) and a large ecosystem.
- + Component-scoped styles
- + Mature & popular
- + Theming
- - Runtime cost
- - Friction with React Server Components
Feature comparison
| Feature | @stitches/react | styled-components |
|---|---|---|
| Runtime | Near-zero runtime | Runtime |
| TypeScript | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Authoring style | Object + variants | Tagged templates |
| SSR support | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Maintenance | Unmaintained | Active |
Related comparisons
Embed this comparison
A live badge for your README — it updates as the numbers change.
[](https://devcompare.dev/compare/stitches-react-vs-styled-components)Data from npm, Bundlephobia and GitHub. Last updated 2026-06-02.